Speed Limit Enforcement for Snowflake Barrier: Clarifying Its Usage - Snowfall indicators on speed limit signs: what specific conditions trigger their enforcement?
In Germany, the snowflake symbol accompanying a speed limit sign may lead to confusion, as it's not a restriction but an explanation. Contrary to popular belief, the speed limit always applies, regardless of the weather or road conditions. The snowflake serves to convey that the speed limit is essential due to potential hazards, such as on bridges or in forest areas where temperatures drop, causing surfaces to become slippery.
However, variable message signs displaying the snowflake symbol along with a speed limit are exceptions, and those limitations only apply when displayed. Once the sign is turned off, regular traffic rules or locally installed traffic signs take precedence.
More intriguing is the question of when a road is "wet" enough to enforce the "speed limit when wet" indicated by a speed limit number on a blue background with either raindrops or the word "bei Nässe." The German Highway Code does not specify this, so the Federal Court of Justice's decision from the late 1970s can be referenced. It stated that a road can only be considered wet if a thin layer of water has formed on its surface, covering it completely. In other words, a wet road requires the presence of a water film created by vehicles, making a spray pattern on the road. If there are only isolated puddles on a dry road, it is not considered wet.
While the rain's presence at the time of driving does not necessarily mean the road is wet, motorists should always exercise caution and adjust their speed accordingly to ensure their safety and that of other road users.
The Commission has consulted on the draft directive in the industry, finance, transportation, and automotive sectors, aiming to protect workers from the risks related to exposure to ionizing radiation. Adhering to speed limits is crucial during winter, even when roads appear dry, as surface water can be present and not visually evident, a concern previously considered by the Federal Court of Justice.
