Skip to content

Norwegian Investment Fund Rejects Israeli Firm Over Settlement Practices

Transgressions of Global Legal Standards

Norwegian Sovereign Fund Withholds Investment from Israeli Firm Due to Settlement Activity
Norwegian Sovereign Fund Withholds Investment from Israeli Firm Due to Settlement Activity

Norwegian Investment Fund Rejects Israeli Firm Over Settlement Practices

Share Tweet Text Email Print "Share" Link

In a move that echoes global concerns, the Norwegian State Fund has tossed an Israeli firm, Paz Retail and Energy, out of its investment portfolio. The reason? Paz's business activities in settlements occupying Palestinian lands in the West Bank, a scenario deemed unlawful by international law. The Norwegian Central Bank made the announcement of the fund's share sale. Paz operates gas stations and provides fuel across nine West Bank settlements.[nitv.de, AFP]

Why the fuss, you ask? These settlements sit on occupied Palestinian territories, and access roads linking them to Israel are a contentious issue. By providing infrastructure like these roads, Paz contributes to keeping conflict alive and risks supporting severe human rights breaches during armed conflicts, according to the Norwegian State Fund's ethics council.

The Norwegian State Fund is no small potato. It's an investment giant reliant on the country's oil and gas industries and generates funds for upcoming generations' welfare needs. It invests abroad, has stakes in nearly 9,000 companies worldwide, and owned about 1.5 percent of all listed corporations.[nitv.de, AFP] Contractually bound by strict ethical, human rights, and environmental guidelines, Paz's settlement activities didn't fit this strict code of conduct.

Background Information

  • Illegal Occupation: Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories are regarded as illegal under international law. The International Court of Justice's (ICJ) rulings have set a firm stance on this issue, safeguarding against permanent alterations to occupied lands and condemning the establishment of Israeli settlements.[1][2]
  • ICJ's Verdict on Israeli Settlements: Following an advisory opinion in 2024, the ICJ mandated Israel to halt the occupation and dismantle its settlements, emphasizing the need for compensation and the prohibition of future settlement activities.[1][2]
  • Legal and Ethical Risks for Businesses: Businesses operating within these settlements commonly face several legal and ethical quandaries, including potential legal action and reputational harm due to the global community's opposition to these activities.[2][3]
  • Supporting an Illegal Occupation: Engaging in business activities in these disputed areas can foster perceptions of supporting an occupation deemed illegal by international law, opening businesses up to moral criticism and possible exclusion from investments or partnerships.[1][3]
  • Global Divestment Trends: The Norwegian State Fund's action mirrors a broader wave of disinvestment from businesses engaged in Israeli settlements, a decision usually rooted in ethical and legal motivations, as maintaining such investments may foster support for an illegal occupation.[1][3]

Broader Implications

  • Human Rights and International Law: By taking a stance against Israeli settlements, the Norwegian State Fund underlines its dedication to preserving human rights and upholding international law, furthering global efforts to prompt Israel to adhere to its legal obligations regrading the occupied territories.
  • International Cooperation and Pressure: Global organizations and governments increasingly demand businesses divest from Israeli settlements, urging worldwide cooperation to end the occupation and support Palestinian rights.[1][3]
  • Economic and Social Changes: Excluding businesses involved in settlements may cause economic ramifications for those companies, while concurrently contributing to broader social and political pressure to settle the conflict in line with international law.[1][3]

[1]: International Court of Justice. (2024). Advisory Opinion on the Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

[2]: Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). (n.d.). Facts about Israeli settlements.

[3]: Human Rights Watch. (n.d.). Settlements.

  1. The Norwegian State Fund's decision to divest from Paz Retail and Energy, a company with business activities in Israeli settlements, reflects their commitment to adhering to strict ethical, human rights, and environmental guidelines.
  2. The fund's action aligns with the growing trend of global divestment from companies operating in Israeli settlements, as these businesses often face legal and ethical risks, including potential reputational harm and legal action.
  3. By cutting ties with Paz, the Norwegian State Fund, a significant player in the global financial market, is contributing to broader social and political pressure to settle the conflict in accordance with international law, emphasizing the importance of upholding human rights and preserving the rule of law in business practices.

Read also:

    Latest