Insider Data on Follow-on Public Offerings (FPOs) Explained
Follow-on Public Offerings, or FPOs, are a common financial tool used by already publicly traded companies to raise additional capital for various purposes such as funding growth, debt reduction, or enhancing liquidity. In this article, we will explore the differences between dilutive and non-dilutive FPOs.
Dilutive FPO (Primary Offering)
In a dilutive FPO, the company issues new shares to the public, raising fresh capital for corporate uses. This increases the number of shares outstanding, leading to share dilution. Since earnings are now spread over more shares, Earnings Per Share (EPS) generally decreases, potentially putting downward pressure on the stock price initially. However, this can be favourable long term if the capital is used effectively.
Non-Dilutive FPO (Secondary Offering)
In contrast, a non-dilutive FPO involves existing shareholders, such as promoters or early investors, selling their shares to the public. The company does not issue new shares, so the total share count and ownership percentages do not change. Earnings Per Share remain the same because the number of outstanding shares is unchanged. Although non-dilutive, large secondary offerings can increase share float and may affect stock price due to market perception of insider selling.
The key difference between these two types of FPOs lies in whether the total shares outstanding increase (dilutive) or remain unchanged (non-dilutive), which directly affects EPS—decreasing it in dilutive FPOs and leaving it unchanged in non-dilutive FPOs.
It's important to note that stock dilution is a risk associated with a dilutive FPO, as it can reduce the ownership percentage and EPS for existing shareholders. Companies may opt for an FPO to raise additional capital for various reasons, but investors should carefully evaluate the financial health of the company, the purpose of the FPO, the company's past performance, future growth potential, and how external factors such as economic trends and industry developments may impact stock prices before investing.
Investing in an FPO can offer lower risk compared to an Initial Public Offering (IPO), as investors have historical data to analyze before making a decision. However, it's crucial to understand the differences between dilutive and non-dilutive FPOs to make informed investment decisions.
[1] "Follow-on Offerings: Dilutive vs. Non-Dilutive." Investopedia, Investopedia, 14 Dec. 2020, www.investopedia.com/terms/f/followonoffering.asp. [2] "Follow-On Offerings." Corporate Finance Institute, Corporate Finance Institute, 2021, www.corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/finance/follow-on-offerings/. [3] "Follow-On Offerings (FPO)." Fool.co.uk, Fool.co.uk, 18 Mar. 2021, www.fool.co.uk/investing/2021/03/18/follow-on-offerings-fpo-explained/. [4] "Follow-On Public Offerings (FPOs)." Investopedia, Investopedia, 14 Dec. 2020, www.investopedia.com/terms/f/followonpublicoffering.asp. [5] "Follow-on Offerings." Investopedia, Investopedia, 14 Dec. 2020, www.investopedia.com/terms/f/followonoffering.asp.
In the context of finance and business, when a company decides to conduct a Follow-on Public Offering (FPO) to raise additional capital, there are two main types: dilutive and non-dilutive. In a dilutive FPO, the company issues new shares to the public, leading to share dilution and a potential decrease in Earnings Per Share (EPS), which might initially put downward pressure on the stock price. On the other hand, a non-dilutive FPO involves existing shareholders selling their shares to the public, with no change in the total share count or ownership percentages, maintaining EPS and limiting the impact on stock price due to market perception of insider selling. As investors, understanding the differences between these two types of FPOs is crucial when making informed decisions in the realm of investing and business.
%20Explained){kind=link}