Lilly Becker Disputes Six-Figure Court Verdict: A Loan or a Gift?
- 🕒 - Approx. 2 Min read
Dispute over high payment: Lilly Becker contests substantial amount - Contentious Financial Matter: Lilly Becker Contests High-Value Amount
originally appeared on ntv (article written informally for easy understanding)
Is it a loan or a gift? This is the burning question between Lilly Becker and TV manager Pierre Uebelhack. Their disagreement over a six-figure sum landed them in court, with partial judgment handed down in April.
During a settlement hearing in February, the reigning Jungle Queen declared that her former suitor had generously gifted her the money. In contrast, Uebelhack asserted that the amount he gave Becker during a financial crisis was, in fact, a loan and demanded repayment. On April 16, Uebelhack emerged victorious at the Munich Regional Court, with his claim granted in full. Becker is now ordered to pay up. According to Bild sources, Uebelhack seeks the return of 154,733 euros and an additional 27,961 euros, plus interest and legal fees totaling 32,248.19 euros and 3,311.18 euros respectively.
But Lilly Becker isn't throwing in the towel, according to RTL reports. The determined 48-year-old has appealed the decision, with the deadline for filing an application falling on May 16.
Becker Declares It a Gift
The relationship between Uebelhack and Becker supposedly blossomed in 2018 - a claim contested by Uebelhack himself. Still, he is said to have lent the moderator a staggering 489,869.12 euros to help her get by during this period. The repayment deadline was set for August 31, 2022. However, Becker maintains that the money was a gift, given within the context of their alleged romantic relationship. According to Uebelhack, there are signed loan agreements to prove that Becker was well aware the funds were borrowed, not a gift. In court, Becker claimed her signature had been digitally added without her knowledge.
Judge Robert Engelmann ruled in April that "the defendant was not truthful." He further explained, "Based on the available evidence, the judge believes that the undisputed funds transferred were not a gift, but a loan. Therefore, he assumes that they must be returned."
- Lilly Becker
- Court Verdict and Appeal
- Repayment Distress and Dispute
(Enrichment Data)
If this legal matter involves a recent court case or legal proceedings, it might be beneficial to consult the relevant court documents or news articles directly related to the case for the most accurate and up-to-date information. Generally, if a court determines a sum to be a loan, repayment terms are usually outlined in a court judgment. If an appeal has been filed, the status of repayment will depend on the outcome of the appeal. Accessing the court documents or specific legal updates would provide the most accurate details.
The community is discussing Lilly Becker's decision to appeal the court verdict, which ruled a large sum she received from Pierre Uebelhack as a loan, not a gift. This dispute stems from the disagreement over the nature of the funds, initially given during a financial crisis, and now subject to a vocational training course in business finance since Lilly Becker's refusal to repay the loan.
