Skip to content

A financially attractive atmosphere functions as a mystical snare, drawing in money with an insatiable demand.

Parliament member Hanna Katrín Friðriksson from The Liberal Reform Party contends that if interest charges in Iceland weren't the country's third biggest expense, as they currently are, it would be feasible to maintain economic stability and prosperity while practicing prudent financial...

A financially attractive atmosphere functions as a mystical snare, drawing in money with an insatiable demand.

In a recent debate, Hanna Katrín Friðriksson, a Member of Parliament for The Liberal Reform Party, highlighted the economic burden of interest charges in Iceland. She argueed that if interest charges weren't the third largest expenditure item, as they are today, the country could achieve sustainable prosperity without relying on continuous borrowing.

Friðriksson criticized the government's deficit operations and debt collection, claiming they have contributed to a rapid increase in interest costs for the state fund. This high-interest environment, she opined, is akin to a money-sucking trap, absorbng resources that could otherwise be utilized in areas such as the welfare system.

Interest-rate charges in Iceland, as a percentage of GDP, are considerably higher than those in neighboring countries and other international nations. This is true even for countries that are more indebted than Iceland. For instance, next year, interest expenses in Iceland are expected to reach 95 billion ISK, which is significant in comparison to the budgets for college and university levels, transportation, and healthcare combined.

Hanna Katrín emphasized the potential impact of lowering interest rates, suggesting that if they were half their current rate, about 40-50 billion ISK could be saved, equivalent to the annual contributions to Health Insurance. This amount could secure contracts with self-employed psychologists, speech therapists, specialists, and others.

Interestingly, long-term interest rates in the EURO area are about half of those in Iceland. Friðriksson posited that it would be advantageous if interest charges in Iceland were at par with those in European countries.

The high interest rates in Iceland can be attributed to several factors, including inflation control measures, exchange rate management, and debt structure. These factors have significant implications for the Icelandic economy, influencing credit costs, currency stability, divergence from Europe, and export competitiveness. As a small, inflation-prone economy, Iceland must balance these external vulnerabilities with domestic stability goals.

  1. Hanna Katrín Friðriksson, in a recent debate, criticized the government's high interest charges, which she referred to as a money-sucking trap, contributing to a significant portion of the country's expenditure.
  2. Friðriksson argued that if interest charges were reduced, a substantial amount could be saved, equivalent to the annual contributions to Health Insurance, and could be used to secure contracts with self-employed health professionals.
  3. Interestingly, long-term interest rates in the EURO area are about half of those in Iceland, and Friðriksson suggested that it would be advantageous for interest charges in Iceland to be at par with those in European countries.
  4. The high interest rates in Iceland are influenced by factors such as inflation control measures, exchange rate management, and debt structure, which have implications for the Icelandic economy, including credit costs, currency stability, export competitiveness, and the balance between external vulnerabilities and domestic stability goals.
Parliamentarian Hanna Katrín Friðriksson, representing The Liberal Reform Party, proposes that lowering interest charges in Iceland, the current third-largest expense category, could lead to a balanced approach of financial sustainability and responsible governance. This, in turn, would eliminate the necessity of constant borrowing to maintain living standards.

Read also:

    Latest